Could such a system be instated whereby a note has a minimum cost of 1 sat (with option to increase) and the sat(s) are set up like a "bounty" where the first person to reply would claim the sat(s)?
This could come alongside a feed filtering option to only view notes greater than x sats, I think a system like this could be very interesting.
Although, while writing I just realised the problem with this... 😣 fucking ReplyGuy would sweep up all the sats... could it work on a pay it forward system? Where replies also cost to post and have the same sort of "bounty system" 🤔 I guess this would lead to sats perpetually locked up in a loop 😣
Don't mind me... early morning thinking out loud 🤣 I think I need another coffee
#coffeechain #asknostr #nostr #WoT #GM
quotingAgain, I have no f idea what is going but my question is this…
nevent1q…f8zy
WoT is a client level bandaid for a larger spam problem…at the network level, I’m assuming this is correct?
If so, then the problem is larger than just reply guy, also an assumption?because there are a 100m bots or more for every one of us
If so, PoW would (reasonably) answer this question at the network level but would require hardware? Correct? Or at least… a built out node on a personal server? Or no?
I hate to say this but a ledger that I used to adore had this issue with bots and there was a part of the code I think time leap… anyway, the network was fixed by making each “note” a tiny fractional cost… can this happen here? Say a sat a post/reply or something a little bigger than what bots would pay?
Hardware can be expensive, a server alone was once a big deal for me but a fraction of a penny on a free wallet? Worth it.
This could just be a ramble that makes no sense, I don’t totally understand this network or the relays yet.
Thank you for coming to my confused TedxTalk. 🙏🏼